Tuesday, May 16, 2006
To: Tod Leonard, The San Diego
Union-Tribune Sports
Hi Tod,
Re: Zucchet passionate about compromise proposal,
May 16, 2006.
You indicate that SDMGA is submitting a separate proposal to the City
Council. The two proposals are really one; Zucchet’s supports ours and
we support his. The spreadsheet we
have submitted to the City Council
adopts the same 4% per
annum increase proposed by Zucchet and fleshes out Zucchet’s call for
the city “to maximize revenues” from non-resident rates by specifying
what market rates are right now (based on what hotel guests tell us they
are actually paying the Lodge at Torrey Pines). Our spreadsheet shows
that the City can generate slightly more revenue than the City now
proposes by holding resident increases to 4% a year and charging market
rates to visitors. We support market rates for visitors, not because we
want to gouge visitors, but because market forces have already driven up
the rates visitors pay and the only issue is whether the City and San
Diego golf will gain the added revenue or whether it will go into the
pockets of the hotels. SDMGA puts San Diegans first by securing that
revenue to benefit all of us; the City’s plan puts special interests
first by setting non-resident rates below market and letting the hotels
broker profits by reselling the tee times they get from the City to
their guests at market rates (causing local golfers to subsidize hotel
profits by paying the unreasonably higher rates currently proposed for
residents by the City). We hope the City Council will join with Mike
Zucchet and SDMGA and the united golfing community in keeping municipal
golf affordable and accessible to local golfers; our spreadsheet shows
this can be done by charging market rates to non-residents.
Paul Spiegelman
San Diego,
CA 92122